Shorts

RPM in Shorts vs long-form — why the gap is so large

Shorts and long-form have very different earnings per view. Here's what drives the gap and how to plan revenue around it.

Last updated: Tue May 12 2026 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

If you've been running both Shorts and long-form, you've noticed Shorts earns 10–30× less per view. This is structural, not a bug — and not something that's changing soon.

The numerical reality

Typical RPM (revenue per 1,000 views) ranges in 2026:

Format Low end Median High end
Long-form, English-speaking audience $1.50 $4.50 $15
Long-form, mixed-geo audience $0.80 $2.50 $8
Shorts, English-speaking $0.08 $0.20 $0.80
Shorts, mixed-geo $0.04 $0.12 $0.30

A long-form video earning $5 RPM earns the same in 1 view as a $0.20 RPM Short does in 25 views.

Why the gap exists

Different ad formats

Different revenue split mechanics

Audience watch behavior

How to plan revenue around this

Don't build a business model that assumes Shorts RPM will rise to match long-form. The structural difference will persist.

For a channel doing both:

Niche differences

RPM varies wildly by niche:

If you have niche flexibility, the RPM math should inform your content choices.

What changed in 2023 that didn't help

The 2023 Shorts monetization overhaul moved from the Shorts Fund (flat-pool, fixed share) to ad revenue share. Most creators saw earnings drop with this change, especially smaller channels — the Fund had been more generous at the low end.

What to actually track

For revenue planning purposes, look at:

This last metric is usually the most decision-useful.